EU pushes to fill Ukraine’s $19bn budget gap next year


Stay informed with free updates

Brussels is urgently exploring ways to cover a shortfall of up to $19bn in Ukraine’s budget next year, as Kyiv grapples with diminishing US support and receding prospects for a ceasefire with Russia.

The European Commission is discussing options with EU member countries, including channelling military support to Ukraine as off-budget grants, frontloading loans from an existing $50bn G7 support scheme for Kyiv, and further leveraging Russian state assets immobilised in the EU, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions.

Ukraine’s projected budget gap next year is not yet covered by external financing.

“There’s growing concern about next year and many stakeholders that were banking on a ceasefire deal this year [to ease Ukraine’s fiscal strains] are having to recalculate their outlays and realising that there’s a [financing] hole whichever way they to try to slice it,” said a senior EU official involved in discussions with Kyiv.

The commission has already had to adjust outlays from Ukraine-related funding streams during 2025, officials told the Financial Times, in response to the extended conflict and lack of confidence in an imminent ceasefire with Moscow.

The urgency in Brussels to rustle up fresh funding comes ahead of a summit focused on funding Ukraine’s reconstruction needs in Rome later this week, which European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen will attend.

The IMF estimates that Ukraine’s financing needs for next year are covered, but that is premised on the war ending this year or in the middle of 2026 — a scenario which Ukraine and the EU do not share.

Ukrainian soldiers watch for drones from a trench near Kostiantynivka, Donetsk region
Ukrainian troops on the lookout for Russian drones near the front line at Kostiantynivka in Donetsk region on Saturday © Viacheslav Ratynskyi/Reuters

IMF managing director Kristalina Georgieva said last month that the Fund “will assess whether this financing gap is going to increase and will require further financing on the external aid”.

The goal is to ensure that Kyiv’s needs are covered well in advance of the winter, especially given the uncertain prospects for further US military support, said one EU diplomat.

One proposal, shared by Kyiv with G7 countries and under consideration by the European Commission, is to channel military support to Ukraine as bilateral grants that would be accounted for separately as an “off-budget external transfer”, while at the same time counting towards national defence spending targets.

This would serve the double goal of contributing to Nato pledges to increase national defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP while providing support to Ukraine. “Instead of duplicating capabilities, European allies could co-finance Ukrainian forces — treating it as a service Ukraine provides to enhance continental security,” Kyiv wrote in a paper shared with G7 allies and seen by the Financial Times.

The commission was set to discuss this and other options with EU finance ministers on Monday evening, two people familiar with the matter said.

“Clearly the military support for Ukraine that member states are giving are not only funds for the defence of Ukraine but for the defence of Europe, and some of that of course will count as defence spending,” said one senior EU diplomat.

Another option is to anticipate disbursements from an existing $50bn G7 scheme that issues loans to Kyiv on the back of profits from Russian state assets immobilised in the West.

Without a ceasefire to boost Ukraine’s domestic economy, Kyiv expects a shortfall of at least $8bn for 2026 even if some of the pledged amounts can be brought forward, from partners including the EU, Japan and US. If that does not happen, then the financing gap could reach $19bn.

A further option could be to extract more value from the Russian immobilised assets, by reinvesting them in riskier asset classes — while devising a way to share responsibility for potentially greater financial losses that would not make Belgium, where most of the assets are held, solely liable for them.

“We are exploring those options including the possibility to further leverage the use of Russia’s immobilised assets,” EU economy commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis said last month.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *